Sheyla Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York, Columbia University Press, , pp. xv. Sheyla Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the. Foundations of Critical Theory. New York, Columbia University Press, , pp. xv, , $ Critique, Norm, and Utopia has 24 ratings and 3 reviews. Displaying an impressive command of complex materials, Seyla Benhabib reconstructs the history of.
|Published (Last):||5 February 2005|
|PDF File Size:||8.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.77 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Critique, Norm, and Utopia: Displaying an impressive command of complex materials, Seyla Benhabib reconstructs the history of theories from a systematic point of view and examines the origins and transformations of the concept of critique from bwnhabib works of Hegel to Habermas.
Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory by Seyla Benhabib
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers benhabub about Critique, Norm, and Utopiaplease sign up. Be the first to ask a question about Critique, Norm, and Utopia. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory
Nov 03, Brendan rated it it was amazing. I totally concur with Peter Gathje’s review. I had this nomr on my shelf for years without reading it. I attended a very critical theory rich graduate school in philosophy and think it may be even more meaningful and useful to me now as it could have been then.
The criticisms she offers at each stage of the main theoretical appropriations I totally concur with Peter Gathje’s review. The criticisms she offers at each stage of the main theoretical appropriations of a general critical theory of society by Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas are clear and thoughtful.
The positive recommendations she argues for in extending critical theory are well-founded. Benhabib argues that we can embrace and extend the communicative ethics laid out by Jurgen Habermas. Her suggestion to modify the theory of communicative action to integrate a concept of, and practices with regard to, a ‘concrete as opposed to a generalized other’ lead her in very interesting directions.
Specifically she calls upon critical theory to integrate into its conceptual framework ideas of ‘friendship’ and ‘solidarity’ and other conceptual discriminations of the ‘concrete’felt, and lived experience of human subjects. She applies her admirably sharp and focused critical skills to unpacking the consequences of Habermas’ adaptation of Mead’s concept of the ‘generalized other’.
I think that perhaps her discussion of Adorno is a bit quick with regard to the turn to Mimesis and aesthetics as the location of emanicpation. That is, I think Adorno might have something a bit more to say in retort to her critique that he is still operating under the pretensions of ‘the philosophy of the subject’ especially in light of the dialectical unpacking of the art object and its potential in Aesthetic Theory. And while this is welcome and persuasive as a critique of Habermas, I think scholarship regarding Mead and Dewey in the 26 years since Benhabib’s book shows that the concrete other was very much a part of their own critical theories of democracy.
That is, as we see in such works as Dewey’s The Public and Its Problems, ‘solidarity’, ‘friendship’, ‘need’ and the ‘concrete other’ are very much present alongside a demystifying critique of the colonization of the lifeworld by ‘instrumental reason’ in Weber’s sense.
Axel Honneth and Hans Joas in particular have shown this to be the case. But this is just to say that Benhabib has allies in Mead and Dewey with regard to achieving a situtation where the ‘negation of the existent in the name of a future that bursts open the possibilities of the present’. Indeed, as Joas has shown, this is Dewey’s understanding of critique in a nutshell.
Dec 27, Michael rated it it was amazing. This is one the best interpretations of Critical Theory and Habermas’ approach to critical theory going. I used this text as an interpretative approach to understanding several of Habermas’ works. It is accessible, straighforward and benbabib of the better books available on critical theory.
Sep 17, Andrew rated it it was amazing.
Benhabib is an exceptionally clear thinker, and here she takes us through the frustrating terrain of the normativity of critical social theory. It contains a great explanation of what Habermas is trying to do, and how he is differentiated from his predecessors like Hegel, Marx and the Frankfurt School. It also contains a searching criticism of Habermas’ discourse ethics Where Benhabib accuses Habermas of falling back into the same kinds of problems of his predecessors when he must use philoso Benhabib is an exceptionally clear thinker, and here she takes us through the frustrating terrain of uyopia normativity of critical social theory.
Where Benhabib accuses Habermas of falling back into the same kinds of problems of his predecessors when he must use philosophically historical narratives to privilege his universal pragmatics over other contemporary post-traditional approaches. Todd rated it liked it May 15, Gilbert rated it really liked it Oct 03, SyphilisVictim rated it it was ok Dec 27, William Hackman rated it liked it Jul 01, Sandra rated it it was amazing Jun 22, Newton rated it it was amazing Mar 19, Mans Ali rated it really liked it Nov 28, David Anderson rated it it was amazing Feb 19, Carlos rated it it was amazing Jan 09, Kelly rated it it was amazing Dec 08, Spencer McKay rated it ktopia it Sep 10, Abysses rated it really liked it Feb 02, Pavel rated it it was amazing Mar 20, Maggie rated it it was amazing Apr 30, Stentor rated it liked it Dec 28, Sebastian rated it really liked it Sep 18, Ageel Ali rated it really liked it May 04, Gina Eom rated it really liked it Feb 27, Sarah rated it it was amazing May 22, Nythamar De Oliveira rated it really liked it Jul 15, Nabil added it Sep 06, Lara Uotpia marked it as to-read Apr 13, Adam marked it as to-read May 04, Tina marked it as to-read Jun 25, Critiquue Struk marked it as to-read Aug 12, Clara marked ebnhabib as benhabibb Sep 19, Chris Buck added it May 06, Diego marked it as to-read Jul 16, Tom Schneitter marked it as to-read May 20, Funda marked it as to-read Jul 22, Louis Colombo marked it rcitique to-read Nov 04, Mark Fitzpatrick marked it as to-read Nov 25, Yasemin added it Apr 12, Jon Gagas marked it as to-read May 23, Bryan added it May 28, Tiago Porto marked it as to-read Aug 10, Minkah marked it as to-read Aug 31, Kevin Yang marked it as to-read Nprm 02, Ozgur is currently reading it Sep 09, Esma marked it as to-read Dec 20, Leah marked it as to-read Jan 07, Muhammad Alfan marked it as to-read Jan 09, Nicholas added it Jan 25, Joonas marked it as to-read Jan 31, Paul marked it as to-read Mar 10, There are no discussion notm on this book yet.
Seyla Benhabib is a Turkish Jewish professor utopix political science and philosophy at Yale, and director of the program in Ethics, Politics, and Economics, and a well-known contemporary philosopher. She is the author Seyla Benhabib is a Turkish Jewish professor of political science and philosophy at Yale, and director of the program in Ethics, Politics, and Economics, and nrm well-known contemporary philosopher.
Radical Philosophy Critique Norm Utopia Archive
She has also worked with many important philosophers and scholars, including Herbert Marcuse. Benhabib is well known for combining critical theory with feminist theory. Books by Seyla Benhabib. Trivia About Critique, Norm, a No trivia or quizzes yet. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.