For hot-dip galvanizing applications, it is possible to measure and verify the steel surface profile according to ASTM D, Standard Test. ASTM D – 11 Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read. ASME B, Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay); ASTM D, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast.

Author: Fenribei Yor
Country: Burkina Faso
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 5 March 2017
Pages: 447
PDF File Size: 9.68 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.8 Mb
ISBN: 455-6-75267-965-2
Downloads: 15886
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kalrajas

Differences in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D4417- Method B vs. Method C

Recent changes to ASTM D provide updated test methods to reflect the latest advances in technology and newly accepted industry research. ASTM D contains three methods of measuring surface profile depth: What is Surface R4417 and Why is it Necessary?

Typical comparator surfaces are prepared with steel shot, steel grit, or sand or other nonmetallic abrasive, since the appearance of the pro? Surface Profile Depth Micrometer – It is now required that the maximum individual reading of 10 or more surface profile readings per area are to be reported, rather than taking the average of ten readings per area.

Each area is marked giving the nominal pro? Larger repair areas or prepared hot-dip galvanized surfaces for painting can be measured with two readings taken from a minimum of three, 6×6 inch 15×15 cm areas. It is the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Leave this field empty.

Updates to ASTM D4417

This method can be used to measure the surface profile depth that is created by abrasive blast cleaning or impact-type power tools. During abrasive blast cleaning, the mass of the abrasive and the velocity of the abrasive movement created by compressed air generates kinetic energy the abrasive can reach speeds of over miles per hour as it exits the blast nozzle.


There are currently four primary standards for measurement of surface profile in steel surfaces. Surface profile is defined as a measurement of the maximum peak-to-valley depth created by abrasive impingement against a surface during abrasive blast cleaning operations, or by an impact-type power tool.

The base of the instrument rests on the tops of the peaks of the surface pro? At each location make ten readings and determine the mean.

This can be done with the unaided eye, under 5 to 10 power magni? Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.

Difference in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D Method B vs CKTA University

There are additional techniques suitable for laboratory use not covered by these test methods. Therefore, differences are inevitable, particularly with deeper surface profiles, and the results may or may not fall within the specified range for one of the two methods.

These changes reflect industry research on current tooling which revealed averaged measurements are consistently less than the values obtained using replica tape. The instruments described are readily portable and sufficiently sturdy for use in the? Subtract the thickness of the noncompressible plastic? Note 1 — Optical microscope methods serve as a referee method for surface profile measurement methods A and B.

Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. Once the burnishing process is complete, the replica tape is removed from the surface and the image is measured using a spring-loaded micrometer. This is done because of evidence that coatings performance in any one small area is primarily influenced by the highest surface features in that area and not by the average roughness.


For this reason, surface profile should be measured prior to coating application to ensure that it meets that specified. When the abrasive impacts the surface, it cuts into the surface angular abrasives or peens the surface round abrasives and creates a series of peaks and valleys in the surface. Models from a few gage manufacturers are available that conform to this standard. NOTE 2—The test methods measure different values and the qualitative rating on which the applicability was determined also measures a different value.

The creation of this peak-valley pattern in the surface effectively increases the surface area, providing an anchor for the coating system. This is done because of evidence that coatings performance in any one small area is primarily in? Precision and Bias 8. Same Surface, Different Results?

Updates to ASTM D | American Galvanizer’s Association

Work Item s – proposed revisions of this standard. This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every?

As a result, only two readings per area are now required to be averaged to obtain one measurement, instead of the three readings previously required. The distance from the bottoms of many of the deepest valleys to the tops of the highest peaks maximum pro?

The instruments described are readily portable and sufficiently sturdy for use in the field. Only the use of surface profile depth micrometers and replica tape were updated, and the specification changes are as follows:.